A Temporary Ban on Flavored Vapes was the Right Move. But a permanent one? Not so fast. | Editorial | Bend | The Source Weekly - Bend, Oregon

Coverage for Central Oregon, by Central Oregonians.
100% Local. No Paywalls.

Every day, the Source publishes a mix of locally reported stories on our website, keeping you up to date on developments in news, food, music and the arts. We’re committed to covering this city where we live, this city that we love, and we hear regularly from readers who appreciate our ability to put breaking news in context.

The Source has been a free publication for its 22 years. It has been free as a print version and continued that way when we began to publish online, on social media and through our newsletters.

But, as most of our readers know, times are different for local journalism. Tech giants are hoovering up small businesses and small-business advertising—which has been the staple for locally owned media. Without these resources, journalism struggles to bring coverage of community news, arts and entertainment that social media cannot deliver.

Please consider becoming a supporter of locally owned journalism through our Source Insider program. Learn more about our program’s benefits by clicking through today.

Support Us Here

Opinion » Editorial

A Temporary Ban on Flavored Vapes was the Right Move. But a permanent one? Not so fast.

Gov. Kate Brown's Oct. 4 decision to temporarily ban all flavored vaporizer products was likely the right move


Gov. Kate Brown's Oct. 4 decision to temporarily ban all flavored vaporizer products was likely the right move. In light of two vape-related deaths in Oregon, and nearly two dozen nationwide, we still don't know enough about the causes for consumers to make informed decisions about whether to continue vaping cannabis and/or nicotine products.

  • Wikimedia Commons, ecigarettereviewed.com

In the long run, however, we're going to need to see a lot more information before this editorial board is going to support the Oregon Legislature moving forward on a permanent ban, as Brown recommended in her executive order last week. Brown's ban, done through executive order, will last six months. Then it's up to Oregon legislators to decide whether they support banning flavored vape products in the state going forward.

Here in Oregon, this issue can really be broken into two parts. One part stems from an effort—which existed long before this vape crisis—to keep e-cig products out of the hands of kids. The Oregon Health Authority and other public health experts have long been working to stop e-cigarette manufacturers from marketing their flavored products to people under the age of 21. That's a valid concern—and for them, the advent of this current vaping crisis is somewhat advantageous, as it's resulted in a ban that they likely would have supported, even without the deaths related to a mysterious lung illness.

But the other part of this is the muddied information people are getting between the potential dangers of THC-containing products and those containing nicotine. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as of Oct. 1, the "latest national and regional findings suggest products containing THC play a role in the outbreak."

There are the people in our state who have found themselves quitting smoking, thanks to the use of vaporizer products. For them, it might seem unfair to see a ban on the products they've used to quit a more harmful substance—when, at least in Oregon, the two people who died contracted their illnesses following the use of cannabis vaporizers, not nicotine ones. Still, it's also fair to say that those using any of those products should get to know what's in them—and so far, the information provided, if any, isn't enough to discern whether a certain ingredient is deemed safe.

"Users may not know what is in their e-cigarette or e-liquid solutions. Many of the products and substances can be modified by suppliers or users," the CDC shared on its website.

There's the very real possibility that some of the chemicals found in both cannabis and nicotine vaporizers are actually causing the illnesses and deaths—but until researchers drill down and find out the answers, it seems unfair to move forward and permanently ban something that may not actually be deadly or dangerous.

For now, we are going to operate on the assumption that state and federal health leaders will be forthcoming with any information they receive about the potential risks—or the opposite, the findings that a certain product is safe—before the debate about a permanent ban really heats up. Consumers deserve to have access to the full picture before they make a determination about whether to use a product, or whether to support a permanent ban. While government has a role in protecting people's health, ultimately, informed consumers can, and should, oversee their own health-related decisions.

Since the Oregon Legislature will ultimately decide whether to ban these products, now—and also at the point that we know definitively what's causing the illnesses—is the time to share your thoughts on this issue with your local representatives.

Add a comment