Climate Change Resolution | Editorial | Bend | The Source Weekly - Bend, Oregon

Coverage for Central Oregon, by Central Oregonians.
100% Local. No Paywalls.

Every day, the Source publishes a mix of locally reported stories on our website, keeping you up to date on developments in news, food, music and the arts. We’re committed to covering this city where we live, this city that we love, and we hear regularly from readers who appreciate our ability to put breaking news in context.

The Source has been a free publication for its 22 years. It has been free as a print version and continued that way when we began to publish online, on social media and through our newsletters.

But, as most of our readers know, times are different for local journalism. Tech giants are hoovering up small businesses and small-business advertising—which has been the staple for locally owned media. Without these resources, journalism struggles to bring coverage of community news, arts and entertainment that social media cannot deliver.

Please consider becoming a supporter of locally owned journalism through our Source Insider program. Learn more about our program’s benefits by clicking through today.

Support Us Here

Opinion » Editorial

Climate Change Resolution

Do something instead of doing nothing

by

comment

As a reporter at my college newspaper I witnessed a scene that reminded me of the current wrangling over Bend's climate change resolution. A young undergraduate was taking advantage of the open-forum hour in the school's student center. Her topic: reducing our consumption of fossil fuels by going vegan. Surrounding her below the podium was not the usual cadre of simpatico hippies and beat poets, but instead a crew of boys who were skeptical to the extreme. To every point that the girl brought forth, the boys had a sardonic counterpoint. They dogged her for wearing shoes—bought from a thrift store—made with plastic soles. They chided her for riding the bus, which consumed fossil fuels.

Eventually, the girl stalked away from the podium with the exclamation, "I can't do everything. Should I do nothing at all?"

That little anecdote strikes to the heart of the question about the efficacy of the Bend City Council's pending resolution on climate change. Some have questioned the resolution for its current lack of actionable steps. Some have said it's going to be difficult to measure a city's overall footprint—and thus, it's impossible to measure whether City of Bend operations have actually been cut by 40 percent by 2030 and 70 percent by 2050, as the current draft of the resolution aims for. Still others say that a resolution means nothing if all those involved—businesses, residents, and governments, all—aren't held to the same standard as city operations. And of course, others have expressed worry about how much it's all going to cost.

These are all valid concerns, and ones the Bend City Council and its climate change working group have heard loud and clear. In a city where funding our road repairs and other capital projects is a serious concern, that team has some big challenges on its plate. Paying for a sustainability coordinator to carry out the eventual "teeth" of the resolution is going to require some cognitive muscle. Determining how to get residents to care—and act—is going to require plenty of creativity.

Whether there are eventual incentives or ordinances, we believe many residents are only truly going to act when they see it benefiting them. Thankfully for the City Council and its climate change working group, there's one big way to bring residents around to their side: cost savings. When a home is required to be built to a higher standard of efficiency, it saves residents money in their heating and cooling bills. Coincidentally, where's the money they've saved likely to be spent? In the local economy, of course. In the battle between the optimists and the naysayers, the argument about overall cost savings might bring more people over to the former side.

There's definitely a cost to adopting this resolution. In the grand scheme of things, however, there's a bigger cost to not acting at all.

About The Author

Nicole Vulcan

Nicole Vulcan has been editor of the Source since 2016. (Blame her for everything since then.) Favorite car: A Trek commuter bike. Favorite cat: An adopted dog who looks like a Jedi master. Favorite things, besides responding to your comments: Downton Abbey re-runs, Aretha Franklin albums, and pink wine.

Add a comment

More by Nicole Vulcan