Good Bridge, Bad Bridge | Letters to the Editor | Bend | The Source Weekly - Bend, Oregon

Coverage for Central Oregon, by Central Oregonians.
100% Local. No Paywalls.

Every day, the Source publishes a mix of locally reported stories on our website, keeping you up to date on developments in news, food, music and the arts. We’re committed to covering this city where we live, this city that we love, and we hear regularly from readers who appreciate our ability to put breaking news in context.

The Source has been a free publication for its 22 years. It has been free as a print version and continued that way when we began to publish online, on social media and through our newsletters.

But, as most of our readers know, times are different for local journalism. Tech giants are hoovering up small businesses and small-business advertising—which has been the staple for locally owned media. Without these resources, journalism struggles to bring coverage of community news, arts and entertainment that social media cannot deliver.

Please consider becoming a supporter of locally owned journalism through our Source Insider program. Learn more about our program’s benefits by clicking through today.

Support Us Here

Opinion » Letters to the Editor

Good Bridge, Bad Bridge

A proposal of building a bridge based off of two chosen sites.



A front-page January article in the Bend Bulletin discussed two proposals for a footbridge to be constructed below the First Street Rapids as an important connection in Bend's Deschutes River Trail system.

Planning proponents have provided two options called Alternative A and Alternative B. They have characterized B as a "much better place" to build a footbridge, and although it would be cheaper than A, assure us, the public, that money has nothing to do with their choice of B.

Anyone who frequents this area of the Deschutes River knows this characterization is simply untrue. First, there are many places in the area where a footbridge could be constructed. Secondly, the choice of Alternative B could not be more disruptive to nature or people.

The proposed B site is in the middle of one of the few natural areas of free-flowing river remaining in Bend. It would impact more neighboring residences than numerous other options, such as alternative A. Since public figures are quite capable of deception, I don't believe we should trust them on this.

Proposed site B would destroy this scarce natural area with a manmade intrusion. And wherever man travels, his garbage follows right behind. On the east bank of the river where proposed Bridge B would be constructed, there are beautiful boulders placed eons ago by Mother Nature as well as old growth Ponderosa Pines.

The sound of the rushing Deschutes River is rare in Bend, but this is one of the few spots where one can sit and enjoy Mother Nature's aquatic symphony.

The Deschutes River is Bend's crown jewel and should be treated with reverence, but it is often treated by locals as a glorified irrigation ditch. Before you support any footbridge proposal, you should visit this area for yourself and experience its uniqueness.

As a nature lover, a Deschutes River lover and a longtime resident of Bend, I can truly say that Alternative B is a "wrong choice" for the proposed footbridge.

Editor's note: Parks officials opted to move forward with option B (2) at their January 3 meeting. Construction cost is estimated to be between $430,000 and $575,000. The district has $500,000 set aside for the project, which could begin as soon as this summer.

About The Author

Add a comment

More by Source Weekly

Latest in Letters to the Editor