In Better Hands: Poorly conceived Hysteria still proves necessity is the mother of invention | Film | Bend | The Source Weekly - Bend, Oregon

Coverage for Central Oregon, by Central Oregonians.
100% Local. No Paywalls.

Every day, the Source publishes a mix of locally reported stories on our website, keeping you up to date on developments in news, food, music and the arts. We’re committed to covering this city where we live, this city that we love, and we hear regularly from readers who appreciate our ability to put breaking news in context.

The Source has been a free publication for its 22 years. It has been free as a print version and continued that way when we began to publish online, on social media and through our newsletters.

But, as most of our readers know, times are different for local journalism. Tech giants are hoovering up small businesses and small-business advertising—which has been the staple for locally owned media. Without these resources, journalism struggles to bring coverage of community news, arts and entertainment that social media cannot deliver.

Please consider becoming a supporter of locally owned journalism through our Source Insider program. Learn more about our program’s benefits by clicking through today.

Support Us Here

Screen » Film

In Better Hands: Poorly conceived Hysteria still proves necessity is the mother of invention

Hugh Dancy stars as a young intern in the film Hysteria.

by

comment

Sometimes a filmmaker’s lofty ideas get in the way of execution. Such is the case with Hysteria, a flick that just scratches the surface of the never-ending fun and/or pathos that should be derived from such a touchy subject matter. Director Tanya Wexler tells the story of the invention of the first vibrator with quaintness and cuteness instead of the raging satire it so richly deserves. The opening prologue of “based on a true story” is followed by the smug … “really,” leading us to believe that this might be a flick with wit and vigor. What we get instead is a romantic comedy period piece with the vibrator saga as backdrop. Personally, I feel the Victorian period is patently boring unless a werewolf gnaws on someone’s neck.


 

The backstory of the first female massage gizmo is that women were once diagnosed with “hysteria” and bad thoughts attributed to a lack of love or attention. The specialist in charge of treatment, Dr. Robert Dalrymple (Jonathan Price) concludes that hysteria stems from an overactive uterus. He employs a young intern, Mortimer Granville (Hugh Dancy), to help with the overload of clientele. Granville’s success in manually stimulating patients results in him getting a sore wrist and cramped fingers. Working with his wacky inventor friend (Rupert Everett), Granville comes up with the first electronic massage unit, or as we today know it, vibrator. Needless to say the device scores a bull’s eye.

We also follow Granville’s medical career at the orgasm clinic and his relationship with two sisters vying for his attention. We know exactly where this movie is going as Mortimer is first smitten by the more conventional daughter Emily Dalrymple (Felicity Jones) then the feisty rebellious Charlotte (Maggie Gyllenhaal) who operates a shelter on the wrong side of town. Let’s see, in true formulaic movie convention, will he go for the safe choice, or take a chance on love? And what about all that darn vaginal stimulation —what’s to become of the masses of unsatisfied hysterical women?

The portrayal of orgasms varies in degree of silliness (none believable in the least) avoiding any form of eroticism. The vibrator stimulation scenes are beyond stupid—as if someone would really sing opera in the saddle.

Feeling like it’s direct from the Women’s Channel, there are jabs at chauvinism while upholding women’s rights. In the end, though, it’s all about the phony fairy tale idea of doing the right thing and falling in love with the right person. The sub-plot of Maggie running a shelter to tug at our hearts strings is just another phony manipulation of Rom-Com formula writing. In the hands of a more seasoned filmmaker, Hysteria could have hit all its high notes and delivered a very intriguing story. Instead we get a glossed over treatment of the fact that, in its day, hysterectomy was essentially a woman’s sexual lobotomy.

Sadly Wexler’s vision for Hysteria is just a tepid telling of what could be a hilarious or deeply serious film. This movie is all touchy feely (pun intended), but in all the wrong places.

Hysteria

2 Stars

Starring Hugh Dancy, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Jonathan Pryce, Felicity Jones, Rupert Everett

Directed by Tanya Wexler

Rated R

Add a comment

More by Morgan P Salvo

Latest in Film