Leaders Should Share Our Schools | Letters to the Editor | Bend | The Source Weekly - Bend, Oregon

Coverage for Central Oregon, by Central Oregonians.
100% Local. No Paywalls.

Every day, the Source publishes a mix of locally reported stories on our website, keeping you up to date on developments in news, food, music and the arts. We’re committed to covering this city where we live, this city that we love, and we hear regularly from readers who appreciate our ability to put breaking news in context.

The Source has been a free publication for its 22 years. It has been free as a print version and continued that way when we began to publish online, on social media and through our newsletters.

But, as most of our readers know, times are different for local journalism. Tech giants are hoovering up small businesses and small-business advertising—which has been the staple for locally owned media. Without these resources, journalism struggles to bring coverage of community news, arts and entertainment that social media cannot deliver.

Please consider becoming a supporter of locally owned journalism through our Source Insider program. Learn more about our program’s benefits by clicking through today.

Support Us Here

Opinion » Letters to the Editor

Leaders Should Share Our Schools

by

comment

How often have your heard a parent encourage children to share, take turns, and to play fair? Our basic role as parents is to instill a spirit of cooperation in our children. And in schools, educators promote the same values, including respect, honesty, good citizenry, and democracy. Teachers understand that the foundation for a positive learning environment is based on mutual trust and an ethical standard. Sounds good, right? Absolutely, well, until you run into something like the Bend-La Pine School District's policy on magnet school admission. Everything about the policy stands apart from the "fairness" principle that teachers/parents impart to children.

The very meaning and purpose of magnet schools is to "magnetize" students from across geographical, socioeconomic and cultural boundaries, so they can participate in an alternative learning approach. Currently, the admission policy for the local magnet schools exempts families within a "magnet zone" from having to participate in a general lottery. Any spots left over are "given" to the general population to compete in a general lottery. In other words, for those of us who can't afford nor want to live in the downtown corridor, we have to fight for the scraps. In the case of Amity Creek Magnet School this academic year, there was one - yes, one - space available to the general population. Magnet schools should not be treated as regular "neighborhood" schools since these neighborhoods are already being served by High Lakes or Miller elementary schools.


Ultimately, the "living in the zone" preferential treatment breeds negative consequences for the community as a whole. It encourages otherwise honest families to exploit loopholes and to resort to dishonest means to get their children into the school of choice. Teachers and administrators are put into an awkward position of defending the district's unfair policy, even to the extent of becoming detectives to ensure there aren't "cheaters" trying to game the system. The policy breeds resentment and causes a rift between the haves and have-nots (families living in the zone vs. outside the zone). How can a school build a trusting, cooperative community when the underlying premise of enrollment highly favors one population group over another? How do you teach children about fairness, mutual respect, and understanding when the privilege of attending a magnet school is underscored by elitism caused by the unfair admission policy.

When we don't speak up about important issues of social injustice, our silence gives consent to that unjust policy and its detrimental consequences. On an interpersonal level, one can't expect everyone to play fair. But on a public level, where a governing body dictates policy that has long-term effects on society, we expect a school district to give equal and fair access to its entire constituent, not just a privileged few.

I invite members of our community to make their voices heard at the upcoming school board meeting, December 13 at 6 p.m.

This existing admission policy is overdue for a complete overhaul, which includes the need for complete transparency in the admission lottery process, increased public outreach regarding magnet schools, and improving the socioeconomic and cultural imbalances at some of the magnet schools. A pure lottery system, subject to public scrutiny, should take its place to ensure all children receive a fair chance at competing for the limited space. Pure chance doesn't discriminate based on who you are, what you are or where you live. It's "natural selection" at its best.

Stand up for the innocent children being locked-out of a fair chance of attending some of the district's best schools.

Chevy Pham

Editor's note: If you want to reach the author directly, email her at
chevypham@gmail.com

About The Author

Add a comment

More by Source Weekly

Latest in Letters to the Editor