Lotto Numbers Don't Add Up | Letters to the Editor | Bend | The Source Weekly - Bend, Oregon

Coverage for Central Oregon, by Central Oregonians.
100% Local. No Paywalls.

Every day, the Source publishes a mix of locally reported stories on our website, keeping you up to date on developments in news, food, music and the arts. We’re committed to covering this city where we live, this city that we love, and we hear regularly from readers who appreciate our ability to put breaking news in context.

The Source has been a free publication for its 22 years. It has been free as a print version and continued that way when we began to publish online, on social media and through our newsletters.

But, as most of our readers know, times are different for local journalism. Tech giants are hoovering up small businesses and small-business advertising—which has been the staple for locally owned media. Without these resources, journalism struggles to bring coverage of community news, arts and entertainment that social media cannot deliver.

Please consider becoming a supporter of locally owned journalism through our Source Insider program. Learn more about our program’s benefits by clicking through today.

Support Us Here

Opinion » Letters to the Editor

Lotto Numbers Don't Add Up



Props to Dr. Nathan Boddie for his piece in favor of health care reform. He succinctly sums up why our system so badly needs change. If we could somehow get all the gun totin', town hall hootin', republi-necks to read his article, we might achieve some real change.

Conversely, I couldn't agree less with your choice of giving local tavern owners the boot over video lottery. First of all, your math figures are misleading and straight up wrong. Cutting the tavern owners' share of profits from 24% to 15% represents much more than a 9% loss of revenue for tavern owners.

Some people say video lottery is a tax on the mathematically challenged. Well, you guys at The Source must be real players. Sixth-grade-level math tells you that if you had $24, and it becomes $15, you lost 37%. So, actually, when you say the average tavern owner "earns $70,000 a year from them, his take would fall to $63,700," what you should have said is that their take would fall from $70,000 to $44,100.

Running a restaurant or bar is expensive. Rent, utilities and labor cost mandate that everything be marked up 60-70%. A glass of Mirror Pond costs $4 at a bar, when you could get it in the store for $1.25 per bottle. Yet, most bars squeak by to make ends meet.

While these machines are a guaranteed profit maker, there's overhead involved. They take up space as well as burn electricity and labor costs. I work as a bartender (not owner). Every time I cash out a lottery ticket, change paper in a machine, or attend to the countless other litanies of operational issues these machines incur, my boss (not the state) pays me to do so. Usually, another customer of our business has to wait in the meantime.

The state needs to remember that these machines are a partnership. Without tavern owners, the state wouldn't make anything off of them.

Dave McRae

Editor's note: Dave and Bruce are in fact correct; our math was off, way off, in the recent Boot. See this week's Department of Corrections in the Upfront section for a better accounting.

About The Author

Speaking of The Boot

Add a comment

More by Source Weekly

Latest in Letters to the Editor