Riding to the Rescue of the Klamath | Editorial | Bend | The Source Weekly - Bend, Oregon

Coverage for Central Oregon, by Central Oregonians.
100% Local. No Paywalls.

Every day, the Source publishes a mix of locally reported stories on our website, keeping you up to date on developments in news, food, music and the arts. We’re committed to covering this city where we live, this city that we love, and we hear regularly from readers who appreciate our ability to put breaking news in context.

The Source has been a free publication for its 22 years. It has been free as a print version and continued that way when we began to publish online, on social media and through our newsletters.

But, as most of our readers know, times are different for local journalism. Tech giants are hoovering up small businesses and small-business advertising—which has been the staple for locally owned media. Without these resources, journalism struggles to bring coverage of community news, arts and entertainment that social media cannot deliver.

Please consider becoming a supporter of locally owned journalism through our Source Insider program. Learn more about our program’s benefits by clicking through today.

Support Us Here

Opinion » Editorial

Riding to the Rescue of the Klamath

Congress may put a damper on Merkley-Thompson dam removal bill.



October 2002 was a low-water mark for the Klamath River, in more ways than one.

In the preceding spring the George W. Bush administration had overridden the recommendations of biologists and allowed irrigators to draw more water from the Klamath. The summer was a hot one, and when migrating salmon arrived from the Pacific Ocean there wasn't enough water for them to get upstream to their spawning grounds.

Crowded into pools of warm water downstream, the fish were easy prey for disease. In the end, more than 30,000 of them died.

There was one positive thing about that disaster: It shocked people into realizing something had to be done about the mess in the Klamath Basin.

For decades, a variety of interests - state and federal governments, Pacific Power, farmers, fishermen, conservation groups and Indian tribes - had fought over the Klamath's limited supply of water. While they wrangled, the salmon and steelhead populations inexorably declined. The Klamath salmon fishery, once the third most productive in the West, had deteriorated by the 21st Century to the point where commercial fishermen weren't allowed to take any salmon at all in some seasons.

In February 2010, after more than two years of complex and difficult negotiations, representatives of the federal government, the governments of California and Oregon, Pacific Power and three Indian tribes signed two agreements that provide for the removal of four old hydroelectric dams on the Klamath and for restoration of fish habitat.

Last week, Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley and California Rep. Mike Thompson jointly introduced legislation to implement the federal government's part of the deal. The federal share of the cost of removing the dams and embarking on the environmental restoration project is estimated to be $536 million, Merkley said, which will be matched by $550 million in non-federal funds.

The Klamath Basin agreements are a remarkable example of widely divergent interests coming together to compromise for the common good. More than that, they could mean an economic windfall for the economically hard-hit Northern California / Southern Oregon coastal region.

According to a press release from Merkley, the Interior Department estimates that dam removal will increase the commercial Chinook salmon fishery's production by 80%, as well as greatly improving salmon and steelhead sport fishing. According to Interior's analysis, the net effect will be the creation of 4,600 jobs in the Klamath Basin.

With those kinds of numbers, congressional approval of the Merkley-Thompson bill ought to be a no-brainer - but since Merkley and Thompson are dealing with a no-brain Congress, it might turn out to be tough. With the Republicans on the rampage against any federal spending, it could be a real challenge to approve $536 million for something as liberal-sounding as "habitat restoration." We can almost hear the Tea Party rhetoric now: "America's broke, and those durn socialists want to spend $536 million to save fish!"

It's going to take strong public support to push the Klamath bill through, and we hope Merkley and Thompson will get it. To encourage them in the fight, we're giving them THE GLASS SLIPPER.

About The Author

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Add a comment

More by Source Weekly