It’s the Ann Romano article. Is that a joke? Is there any documentation of Scientology? Would she/you do the same thing to Baptists/Catholics/ etc.? I am overwhelmed with the content; there is nothing about The Week in Review. It’s not a week in review. It’s without resource-fullness, which makes it just trash.
Is there a mature person writing the article? Is there a 27 year old or a 44 year old. Her immaturity is all over the article and perhaps that’s the intent. If so, then it’s just trash and if the Source prints articles like that, what’s a reader of the Source to do? Just look at the ads? It does get me riled up.
Which is a good thing. Travolta and Cruise are two separate people. They don’t become one just because you use the word Scientology. What would Ms. Romano do if/when she were to read about Scientology and find she is on the wrong track, and there is certainly a wrong track in her article. Now pass this on to the editor, the assistant editor, the editorial board.
Did I research this reply before sending it? Yes, actually I did and I go the results from my common sense file.