Sowing the Seeds: Can Obama’s grassroots campaign deliver like it did in ’08? | The Source Weekly - Bend, Oregon

Sowing the Seeds: Can Obama’s grassroots campaign deliver like it did in ’08?

The Penn Hills neighborhood team leader for the Obama for America campaign was in East Liberty on Oct. 6 canvassing neighborhoods, talking to potential voters and making sure they were registered to vote.

(altweeklies wire/Pittsburgh City Paper)

Joseph Lewis was looking mighty happy for a guy who was about to spend the next three or four hours walking around in the rain.

The Penn Hills neighborhood team leader for the Obama for America campaign was in East Liberty on Oct. 6 canvassing neighborhoods, talking to potential voters and making sure they were registered to vote.

 


He wasn't involved in the campaign four years ago when Barack Obama was delivered to the White House on the shoulders of an energized base of grassroots volunteers—many mobilized by the ideas of hope and change.

 

Lewis still buys into the concepts of hope and change, but he's also a little pissed off.

"I don't like the way Republicans have tried to block this president," Lewis said as he buttoned up his jacket. "The Republicans' only agenda has been to stop this president. It's unpatriotic and I became infuriated at what I was seeing. That's why I'm here today."

He's not alone. They may be out here for different reasons but the several dozen volunteers that packed into this Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Obama campaign office on a cold, rainy morning have one objective: to get the president re-elected.

And their grassroots campaign this year, the Obama camp says, is far bigger than the one in 2008.

Much was made of the importance of Obama's ground game in the last election. He ran a wide grassroots campaign of energized volunteers, a strong voter-registration drive, a well-built social-media strategy and a significant influx of contributions from individuals.

But this time around, Obama can no longer play the role of the political outsider bringing hope to Washington. He has four years of policies—both successes and failures—to defend.

Despite all of that, the Obama organization has been resolute in running the same type of campaign—a ground-up approach that begins with a mobilized group of volunteers and not an overabundance of spending on television, radio and newspaper advertisements.

"We have always believed that in a close election, our grassroots infrastructure will ultimately make the difference in November," says Matt Mittenthal, spokesman for Obama's Western Pennsylvania effort.

So far the numbers look good.

The campaign has received more than 10 million grassroots donations in 2012, and 98 percent of those, Mittenthal says, were $250 or less. Also, nearly 600,000 Americans have donated to a political campaign for the first time. That's up from about 370,000 first-time donations at this time in 2008.

Campaign officials say such numbers show that Obama's support base from 2008 has returned. And if that infrastructure worked once, it can work again. In an email to supporters last week, campaign manager Jim Messina wrote: "Day in and day out, what gives the President confidence and inspiration is knowing that you have his back."

"We've got his back," reads the text of the black-and-white poster of President Obama, that features a photo of the president shot from behind with a hand on his shoulder. The picture sits prominently over the left shoulder of volunteer team leader Matt Phillips as he instructs a group of volunteers — most from labor union SEIU—about how to conduct the door-to-door canvass they're about to embark on. Currently he's instructing volunteers on how to handle an encounter with a voter who turns out to be a supporter of Republican Mitt Romney.

"You're not going to win that fight," Phillips tells the volunteers. "You can hit five more houses in the time it takes you to have one long, drawn-out discussion with a person whose mind you're not going to change anyway.”

In August, the Washington Post reported that volunteers for Obama like these led Romney's by a 3-to-1 margin. Obama has funneled nearly $50 million, the Post reports, to fund their efforts compared to $8 million by the Romney campaign.

But the Republicans are at least trying not to seem fazed. Rick Wiley, political director of the Republican National Committee, told the Post: "The Obama campaign is quick to tout how many people they have on payroll, but they don't seem to be doing anything."

And RNC chairman Reince Priebus told Capitol Hill publication Roll Call: "I find all of their ground-game talk to be garbage. They've got a decent ground game but they over-hype it so much."

But Mittenthal says the proof is in both the fundraising numbers and the sheer volume of events held by the Obama camp in states like Pennsylvania.

Over the weekend, there were 500 events posted on the state campaign's website, all happening within a 40-mile radius of the city. Mittenthal also pointed out that the Romney campaign website "appears to have no events scheduled for the Pittsburgh area."

Charlotte Foster, was in his early 20s when he volunteered for Obama in 2008, says there's has been change in the Obama grassroots effort. He says things "are much more organized this time around, much more efficient."

"It was new in 2008," he says. "I remember coming into the office and standing around waiting for something to do. We don't have that this time and we shouldn't. There's nothing more frustrating than coming out on a Saturday to volunteer your time and waiting around for something to do."

That certainly wasn't the case on Oct. 6. Shortly before 10 a.m. the office seemed to erupt in an organized chaos of volunteers coming in at once, getting their campaign materials — maps, commit-to-vote cards, etc. — and heading out into the streets. By 10:15, the office was calm again with little more than the sounds of two phone-bank volunteers making calls and Phillips instructing the first-timers.

Even if the infrastructure of the grassroots campaign is improved upon over the 2008 effort, G. Terry Madonna, director of the Center for Politics and Public Affairs at Franklin and Marshall College, says there are a lot of intangibles from that campaign that can't be duplicated.

"The ground game of that 2008 campaign was one of the most underreported stories of that election cycle," Madonna says. "You will never have the same level of enthusiasm this year that you did in that historic election of '08. Now that doesn't mean he's not going to win, or that he's not going to win by a large margin. But it's going to be hard to duplicate the feeling of that 2008 campaign."

Where the solid ground game will help Obama, Madonna says, is in the get-out-the-vote efforts.

"There's a relatively small pool of undecided voters out there this time around," he says. "And that puts a premium on efforts to make sure your supporters actually come out and vote. That could be a huge factor, especially if the race starts to narrow."

Phillips agrees.

"This time around we're basically talking with our voters," Phillips says. "The most important thing we can do is work to get out the vote."

Photo taken by Charlie Deitch.

Comments (0)
Add a Comment
For info on print and digital advertising, >> Click Here