The Bully's Sour Grapes | Letters to the Editor | Bend | The Source Weekly - Bend, Oregon

Coverage for Central Oregon, by Central Oregonians.
100% Local. No Paywalls.

Every day, the Source publishes a mix of locally reported stories on our website, keeping you up to date on developments in news, food, music and the arts. We’re committed to covering this city where we live, this city that we love, and we hear regularly from readers who appreciate our ability to put breaking news in context.

The Source has been a free publication for its 22 years. It has been free as a print version and continued that way when we began to publish online, on social media and through our newsletters.

But, as most of our readers know, times are different for local journalism. Tech giants are hoovering up small businesses and small-business advertising—which has been the staple for locally owned media. Without these resources, journalism struggles to bring coverage of community news, arts and entertainment that social media cannot deliver.

Please consider becoming a supporter of locally owned journalism through our Source Insider program. Learn more about our program’s benefits by clicking through today.

Support Us Here

Opinion » Letters to the Editor

The Bully's Sour Grapes

Letter to the editor.



That's what the editorial in the January 28 editorial sounded like to me. Over these past months, I have increasingly wondered what was driving the Bulletin's almost hysterical opposition to the ballot Measures 66 and 67.

I understand the loss of people's confidence in government, in part because of the influence of lobbyists. Government has a sacred trust to provide for the welfare of the whole people - not just those who can get them re-elected. Equally sacred is the task of a free press to tell not only the truth but to care for the welfare of the whole people - not simply the advertising accounts that fund the paper. In my life, I have known individual reporters and publishers who worked hard to be independent - even of those who funded them. Alas, I have not seen that in The Bulletin, either in its editorials or staff articles, in this campaign.

Painting a target on the back of Judy Stiegler because she supported the measures is your right, but I suspect you may have diminished credibility because of the way you covered the campaign. Those you paint as villains may have increased public credibility. Lack of confidence in you may well have increased support for the measures.

Washington and Salem must take steps to increase credibility and transparency. The times demand it. No less must The Bulletin reorder its house!

Editor's Note: This letter was originally submitted to and rejected by The Bulletin. It's printed here at the author's request.

About The Author

Add a comment

More by Source Weekly

Latest in Letters to the Editor