The Downtown Anti-Panhandler Crusade | Editorial | Bend | The Source Weekly - Bend, Oregon

Coverage for Central Oregon, by Central Oregonians.
100% Local. No Paywalls.

Every day, the Source publishes a mix of locally reported stories on our website, keeping you up to date on developments in news, food, music and the arts. We’re committed to covering this city where we live, this city that we love, and we hear regularly from readers who appreciate our ability to put breaking news in context.

The Source has been a free publication for its 22 years. It has been free as a print version and continued that way when we began to publish online, on social media and through our newsletters.

But, as most of our readers know, times are different for local journalism. Tech giants are hoovering up small businesses and small-business advertising—which has been the staple for locally owned media. Without these resources, journalism struggles to bring coverage of community news, arts and entertainment that social media cannot deliver.

Please consider becoming a supporter of locally owned journalism through our Source Insider program. Learn more about our program’s benefits by clicking through today.

Support Us Here

Opinion » Editorial

The Downtown Anti-Panhandler Crusade

When you fall on hard times, it's always tempting to look for someone other than yourself - your financial adviser, your banker, the brother-in-law who



When you fall on hard times, it's always tempting to look for someone other than yourself - your financial adviser, your banker, the brother-in-law who told you to put all your money in GM stock - to blame the fall on. Now that Bend's downtown is hurting, the search for scapegoats is on. The latest candidate: panhandlers.

The Bend City Council has asked City Attorney Mary Winters to look into legal ways that the city can deal with the perceived panhandling problem. This came in response to a complaint from a local merchant who thought people standing out on the sidewalk asking for money could be hurting business.

Some councilors agreed with her, including Tom Greene, who was quoted as saying, "I've had a lot of people say it makes them uncomfortable to go downtown."

Skeptical as we always are of any claim that begins with "I've heard a lot of people say," we can believe that some people might be made uncomfortable by the presence of a panhandler. But we don't believe panhandlers are numerous enough or aggressive enough to be making an appreciable difference in downtown foot traffic.

And we don't believe they're a "problem" that the government of Bend - which presently is standing on the edge of the financial abyss with one foot on a banana peel - should be wasting time, energy and money on.

The attempt to address the panhandler "problem" is the latest in a series of efforts by the city to sanitize Bend - or at least the downtown part of it, which seems to be the only business district that councilors worry about. (Panhandlers have been plying their trade unmolested on the north, east and south sides for years.)

Early this month the council passed an ordinance making it a Class B misdemeanor to ride a skateboard downtown; perpetrators of this heinous crime can be fined $250 plus court costs. Before that, local merchants and city officials worked themselves into a sweat over the insidious menace of graffiti.

It's time for city councilors and local businesspersons to face the unpleasant truth: If downtown shops and restaurants are running in the red, it isn't because of graffiti or skateboards or guys on the street with cardboard signs - it's because the economy sucks, and passing city ordinances won't do anything to change that.

Councilors and business leaders might also pause to consider that if you aggressively promote growth, you're going to get the unpleasant aspects - including panhandlers - that go with it. You can't have a city of 80,000 and expect it to look and feel like a quaint little village of 20,000. The legal experts say it will be tough, if not impossible, to write an anti-panhandling ordinance that would hold up in court. Such ordinances in Portland, Springfield and Medford have all been struck down on constitutional grounds.

Trying to craft an acceptable law - much less defending it against the inevitable legal challenge that would ensue - just isn't worth the time, money and effort. The council should tell City Attorney Winters to forget about it and give this idea THE BOOT.

About The Author

Speaking of The Boot

Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

Add a comment

More by Eric Flowers