The Politics of No | Letters to the Editor | Bend | The Source Weekly - Bend, Oregon

Coverage for Central Oregon, by Central Oregonians.
100% Local. No Paywalls.

Every day, the Source publishes a mix of locally reported stories on our website, keeping you up to date on developments in news, food, music and the arts. We’re committed to covering this city where we live, this city that we love, and we hear regularly from readers who appreciate our ability to put breaking news in context.

The Source has been a free publication for its 22 years. It has been free as a print version and continued that way when we began to publish online, on social media and through our newsletters.

But, as most of our readers know, times are different for local journalism. Tech giants are hoovering up small businesses and small-business advertising—which has been the staple for locally owned media. Without these resources, journalism struggles to bring coverage of community news, arts and entertainment that social media cannot deliver.

Please consider becoming a supporter of locally owned journalism through our Source Insider program. Learn more about our program’s benefits by clicking through today.

Support Us Here

Opinion » Letters to the Editor

The Politics of No



It is very evident that the Republican Party in Washington is playing the game of saying "no" particularly when it comes to any medical care bill that is presented by the Obama administration. The same attitude seems to apply to many other areas of what Obama is trying to do to get us out of the financial mess that we are presently in. My question is: Is it more than differences in political philosophy and partisan politics?

About 25 years ago, I led a group of people to build senior citizen housing in New Jersey. The need was very evident, but it took a 14-year battle to overcome both political and citizen opposition. We finally got it built because the city had no low-income housing and they would not be getting government revenue sharing funds that amounted to millions of dollars. Senior citizen housing qualified for low-income housing. The reason for the change was money, not a social need. But community opposition continued because of another factor that played into the picture. It has been called racism. The community was lily-white. Low-income housing meant that "negroes" and "Puerto Ricans" would be moving into the community. This fear dominated the whole white community. When applications for this housing were received, some 1,200 were from low-income white people who lived in the community, not one black or Puerto Rican applicant. The real opposition was founded in the fear of blacks and Puerto Ricans coming into the community. In other words: racism.

Racism isn't a word that is spoken in public, but it still very much exists in this country. No one talks about it, but could "The Politics of No" in Washington have some bearing on the fact that we now have a black President? There may be more truth to this statement than anyone cares to admit.

About The Author

Add a comment

More by Source Weekly

Latest in Letters to the Editor