The State of Oregon vs. the Big Bad Wolf | Editorial | Bend | The Source Weekly - Bend, Oregon

Coverage for Central Oregon, by Central Oregonians.
100% Local. No Paywalls.

Every day, the Source publishes a mix of locally reported stories on our website, keeping you up to date on developments in news, food, music and the arts. We’re committed to covering this city where we live, this city that we love, and we hear regularly from readers who appreciate our ability to put breaking news in context.

The Source has been a free publication for its 22 years. It has been free as a print version and continued that way when we began to publish online, on social media and through our newsletters.

But, as most of our readers know, times are different for local journalism. Tech giants are hoovering up small businesses and small-business advertising—which has been the staple for locally owned media. Without these resources, journalism struggles to bring coverage of community news, arts and entertainment that social media cannot deliver.

Please consider becoming a supporter of locally owned journalism through our Source Insider program. Learn more about our program’s benefits by clicking through today.

Support Us Here

Opinion » Editorial

The State of Oregon vs. the Big Bad Wolf

The wolf has always gotten bad press. To early Christians he was a symbol of evil, or even the Devil himself (in contrast to Jesus, the “good shepherd” protecting the flock).

by

1 comment

The wolf has always gotten bad press. To early Christians he was a symbol of evil, or even the Devil himself (in contrast to Jesus, the "good shepherd" protecting the flock). In folklore, from werewolf legends to tales about the Big Bad Wolf who harassed the Three Little Pigs and the wolf who almost ate Little Red Riding Hood, Canis lupus consistently was cast as a villain - though sometimes a comic one.

His literary reputation, combined with a tendency to grab the occasional spring lamb or calf, didn't endear the wolf to European-Americans as they moved across America and set up farms and ranches. The result was a campaign of extermination that eliminated wolves from most of the lower 48 states, including Oregon.

Wild wolves hadn't been seen in this state from the 1940s until January 2008, when a female made it across the Snake River from Idaho and established a pack in the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. There are now two packs - the original Imnaha pack, with 10 wolves, and the Wenaha pack, with four.

The survival of the Oregon wolf population is precarious - which is why it's a good thing a state-sanctioned hunt for two of the animals has been called off.

After the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife determined that wolves had killed six calves in the Wallowa Valley this spring, it issued a permit to kill up to seven wolves if caught in the act of attacking livestock. It also gave permission for state Wildlife Services to hunt down and kill two wolves from the Imnaha pack.

Four conservation groups went to court to challenge ODFW's action, and in response Wildlife Services agreed to put off the wolf hunt for at least four weeks. Hopefully it will have the sense to call it off indefinitely.

With only 14 individuals, the Oregon wolf population can ill afford to lose more of its members. (Two other wolves were killed by Wildlife Services last year.) The wolves don't seem to be posing any immediate threat: None are known to be in the Wallowa Valley now, and there haven't been any livestock killings for at least a month.

There's also evidence that the two Imnaha wolves sentenced to death aren't guilty. The conservation groups say information from their radio collars indicates they weren't even in the valley when the calves were taken.

The state currently is re-evaluating its five-year-old wolf management plan, and it should rewrite it to put more emphasis on non-lethal means of predation control and less on slaughter. "With only 14 wolves and one breeding pair in the state, killing wolves should be the option of last resort," said Rob Klavins of Oregon Wild, one of the groups bringing the court action.

So here's a GLASS SLIPPER to the conservation groups for blocking the ill-advised wolf hunt, and one BOOT to ODFW for sanctioning it in the first place - with the other BOOT to follow if it changes its mind this summer and decides to go ahead with the killing after all.

About The Author

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

 

Add a comment

More by Source Weekly