UGB is a Recipe for Sprawl | Letters to the Editor | Bend | The Source Weekly - Bend, Oregon

Coverage for Central Oregon, by Central Oregonians.

The Source Weekly has been here for you, keeping you in the know throughout the coronavirus pandemic.

We’ve delivered important updates and dispatches from a summer of racial unrest.

We’ve interviewed dozens of state and local political candidates to help you make an informed decision during election season.

And we’ve brought you 22 years of important news and feature reporting—along with all the events, happenings, food, drink and outdoors coverage you’ve come to know and love. We’re a newspaper for Central Oregon, by Central Oregonians, and it is and always has been free for readers.

If you appreciate our coverage, we invite you to spread the love and to join our growing membership program, Source Insider.
Support Us Here

Opinion » Letters to the Editor

UGB is a Recipe for Sprawl

by

6 comments

This week's letter comes from former city councilor John Schubert who asks a question that's been on a lot of people's minds lately: "What's with the massive urban growth boundary expansion proposal?"

An advocate of smart growth and alternative transportation planning, Schubert questions whether the city's past subsidies to the building community have led to the current fiscal crisis in Bend. Thanks for the letter, John. You can claim your prize for this week's winning letter at the Source headquarters, 704 NW Georgia.

I recently I flew from Frankfurt, Germany to Moscow and marveled at how clearly the land use patterns unfolded below me. Compact town led to open agricultural land led to forest land, and then the pattern repeated, over and over, mile after mile. No rural sprawl as in Deschutes County; no fuzzy boundary between city and farmland as in Bend; no homes in the forest. Later in the trip I remarked on my flight observations to a German acquaintance I met. I asked why he thought this was so. Without a second hesitation, he said, "It is most certainly because to do anything else is incredibly wasteful of government money and natural resources."


I was stunned that an ordinary citizen understood this without blinking an eye. This argument of economic and resource efficiency should be well understood by the business community, especially if they are called upon to pay their way in land development. I was aghast to read that Bend developers expect the entire community to subsidize their developments at the fringe of the city. I suggest that too-many-to-count taxpayer subsidies to growth are the biggest cause of skyrocketing living costs in Bend and the current city fiscal crisis. They have led to increasing property taxes, increasing utility costs, increasing housing costs, increasing transportation costs. And all the while, we still haven't figured out how to adequately maintain our transportation system, provide adequate affordable housing, fund schools to provide reasonable class sizes.... Until we get a handle on these things, it makes no sense to me to dramatically expand the UGB and cause more inefficient land use and subsidized runaway growth.

John Schubert, former planning commissioner and city councilor

About The Author

Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment
 

Add a comment

More by Mike Bookey

Latest in Letters to the Editor